Wikipedia

From WikiAlpha
(Redirected from Mohammad Siyam)
Jump to: navigation, search
The below content is licensed according to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License contrary to the public domain logo at the foot of the page. It originally appeared on http://en.wikipedia.org. The original article might still be accessible here. You may be able to find a list of the article's previous contributors on the talk page.

For the differences between Wikipedia and WikiAlpha, please read WikiAlpha is not Wikipedia.

Wikipedia
A white sphere made of large jigsaw pieces. Letters from many alphabets are shown on the pieces.
URL http://wikipedia.org
Slogan The Free Encyclopedia
Commercial? No
Type of site Wiki
Registration Optional
Available in Multilingual
No. of users 80 million (all languages)
35 million (English)
Owner Wikimedia Foundation
Launched 15 January 2001 (English)
Current status Active


Wikipedia (/ˌwɪkɨˈpdiə/ or /ˌwɪkiˈpdiə/ WIK-i-PEE-dee-ə) is an open and multilingual wiki supported by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation through donations. It is by far the most successful and well known wiki in existence, as well as the largest and one of the oldest still active. Its 50 million articles (5 million in English alone)[1] have been written collaboratively by volunteers from around the world. Most of its pages can be edited by anyone with access to the site, and the English version has about 140,000 regularly active contributors. As of March 2019, there are active editions of Wikipedia in 293 languages.[2] It has become the largest and most popular general reference work on the Internet,[3][4] and one of the most popular websites according to Alexa rank.


Wikipedia was launched in January 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger.[5] Sanger coined the name Wikipedia,[6] which is a portmanteau of wiki (a technology for creating websites collaboratively, from the Hawaiian word wiki, meaning "quick")[7] and encyclopedia.

In 2005, Nature published a peer review comparing 42 hard science articles from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia and found that Wikipedia's level of accuracy approached that of Britannica,[8] although critics suggested that it might not have fared so well in a similar study of a random sampling of all articles or one focused on social science or contentious social issues.[9][10] Time magazine stated that the open-door policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the biggest and possibly the best encyclopedia in the world, and was a testament to the vision of Jimmy Wales.[11]

Wikipedia has been criticized for exhibiting systemic bias, for presenting a mixture of "truths, half truths, and some falsehoods",[12] and for being subject to manipulation and spin in controversial topics.[13] In 2017, Facebook announced that it would help readers detect fake news by suitable links to Wikipedia articles. YouTube announced a similar plan in 2018.[14]

Usual Wikipedia Controversies

Wikipedia is far left liberal occult "encyclopedia." It deliberately allows mistakes to happen every day. To senior editors like wikiBayer (GAYER), operator873 (wikipedia's official stooge) Matěj Suchánek, konstantinaG07, mtarch11, antandrus, EPIC (disaster) convicted war criminal Nuon Chea was not second in charge of Khmer Rouge and he was not its chief ideologist.[15]. Such war edits start by utmost wikidiots like antandrus (david, wikipedia's official satanic incarnation) or his partners incrime javaHurricane and XXBLackburnXx aka Wikipedia's Evil Triumvirate. This is only a dop in an ocean.. Wikipedia also loves to accuse elederly people of killing heads of state[16]. Vandalizing great saints like John Paul 2 is highly receommended even by polish wikipedians masti, ciacho5, WTM, roodyAlien, malarz.pl, tsca, zero[17] as do Yugoslavian traitors ehrlich91 toni ristovski, anToni, djido, dungodund (sernbiam djubre war criminal), dcirovic, sadko, Edgar Allan Poe ("deleted" sure https://archive.ph/Ocop0) et al..


Partners in wikicrimes (off and on wiki) HARDOCE LTA VANDALS XXBlackburnXx (DOS attacker criminal who shut down internet access to Chicago's hospital among his other many internet crimes), firefangledfeathers, codename Noreste, antandrus (utmost wikipedia contradicitons hypocrisy stupidity master: simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Player_piano&diff=prev&oldid=9578492 ferien, fehufange (with blessing of senior administrators eptalon, auntof6, operator873 (official wikistooge), griffinofwales, fr33kman FREAKO are so stupid they vandalize pianolo...to them it dpes not use perforamted piano rolls to play itself.[18]


XXBlackburn/antandrus/leonidlednev/javaHurricane/1234qwer1234qwer4/WikiBayer Controversies (THE WIKIPEDOIA EVIL HALF A DOZEN)

Wikipedia is very controversial but they rarely kill their archived talk.. Not when it comes to XXBlackburnXx who loves to kill 20 year old info from many contributors.. He loves that just for the hell of it...

https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Saddam_Hussein&action=history&offset=&limit=500

Wikipedia is perfect example of bigotry, indifference and total hatred... They do not want to expose truth on kidnapped girls in Pakistan, Punjab province... To them it's ok young girls (especially Christian) are taken from their parents and raped. XXBlackburnXx wants them dead too. Most are psychology dead anyway as they have been violated and lost touch woth their parents. Parents are suffering too not knowing what happened to their children. But on wikipedia such crimes are the norm. Very rareely wikipedia has good editors LIKE GOOD OLD GEORGE trying to stop vandalism of saints. XXBlackburnXx tried to install all sorts of filters, but he was beaten yet again:

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/XXtrshXx

21:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)ON WIKIPEDIA, ITS OK FOR MUSLIM TERRORISTS TO RAPE LITTLE CHRISTIAN GIRLS; ANTANDRUS, UANFALA & LUGNUTS (NUTS ALRIGHT) CONFIRM:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Punjab,_Pakistan&diff=prev&oldid=982227977


https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Punjab_(Pakistan)&diff=prev&oldid=9578795

https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Punjab_(Pakistan)&action=history


https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Punjab_(Pakistan)&action=history&offset=&limit=500

Alternatives to Wikipedia

References

  1. As of 1 March 2019.
  2. List of Wikipedias. Meta-Wiki.
  3. Bill Tancer (May 1, 2007). "Look Who's Using Wikipedia". Time. http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1595184,00.html. Retrieved December 1, 2007. "The sheer volume of content [...] is partly responsible for the site's dominance as an online reference. When compared to the top 3,200 educational reference sites in the US, Wikipedia is No. 1, capturing 24.3% of all visits to the category" . Cf. Bill Tancer (Global Manager, Hitwise), "Wikipedia, Search and School Homework" 25, 2012/https://web.archive.org/web/20120325220239/http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2007/03/wikipedia_search_and_school_ho.html Archived March 25, 2012, at the Wayback Machine., Hitwise, March 1, 2007.
  4. Alex Woodson (July 8, 2007). "Wikipedia remains go-to site for online news". Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSN0819429120070708. Retrieved December 16, 2007. "Online encyclopedia Wikipedia has added about 20 million unique monthly visitors in the past year, making it the top online news and information destination, according to Nielsen//NetRatings." 
  5. Mike Miliard (March 1, 2008). "Wikipediots: Who Are These Devoted, Even Obsessive Contributors to Wikipedia?". Salt Lake City Weekly. http://www.cityweekly.net/utah/article-5129-feature-wikipediots-who-are-these-devoted-even-obsessive-contributors-to-wikipedia.html. Retrieved December 18, 2008. 
  6. How I started Wikipedia, presentation by Larry Sanger
  7. “wiki” in the Hawaiian Dictionary, Revised and Enlarged Edition, University of Hawaii Press, 1986
  8. Jim Giles (December 2005). "Internet encyclopedias go head to head". Nature 438 (7070): 900–901. Bibcode 2005Natur.438..900G. doi:10.1038/438900a. PMID 16355180. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7070/full/438900a.html. Template:Subscription required Note: The study was cited in several news articles; e.g.:
  9. Reagle, pp. 165–166.
  10. Orlowski, Andrew (16 Dec 2005). "Wikipedia science 31% more cronky than Britannica's Excellent for Klingon science, though". The Register. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/16/wikipedia_britannica_science_comparison/. Retrieved 25 February 2019. 
  11. "The 2006 Time 100". Time. May 8, 2006. http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1975813_1975844_1976488,00.html. Retrieved November 11, 2017. 
  12. Black, Edwin (April 19, 2010) Wikipedia – The Dumbing Down of World Knowledge 9, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20160909210831/http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/125437 Archived September 9, 2016, at the Wayback Machine., History News Network Retrieved October 21, 2014
  13. J. Petrilli, Michael (SPRING 2008/Vol.8, No.2) Wikipedia or Wickedpedia? 21, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20161121024654/http://educationnext.org/wikipedia-or-wickedpedia/ Archived November 21, 2016, at the Wayback Machine., Education Next Retrieved October 22, 2014
  14. Cohen, Noam (April 7, 2018). "Conspiracy videos? Fake news? Enter Wikipedia, the ‘good cop’ of the Internet". The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/conspiracy-videos-fake-news-enter-wikipedia-the-good-cop-of-the-internet/2018/04/06/ad1f018a-3835-11e8-8fd2-49fe3c675a89_story.html. 
  15. https://archive.is/wip/xs2Oi
  16. http://archive.is/Y0BB
  17. https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pope_John_Paul_II&action=history&offset=&limit=500 http://archive.is/XSEXQ
  18. https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Player_piano&diff=prev&oldid=9578555

External links

  • https://rosyjskieabc.blogspot.com/2015/09/system-edukacji-w-polsce-rosji-i.html?showComment=1701573314268#c6162973881701489807